USPTO serial 76286825
THE SOFTEST SOFT DRINK OF ALL...MILK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3376706Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2008
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SOFTEST SOFT DRINK OF ALL...MILK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Port Perry, Ontario, CA
Port Perry, Ontario, CA
Port Perry, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen A. McGee
KAREN A MCGEE BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST N WSTE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Refrigerated bulk vehicular containers for milk | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Paper and cardboard containers for milk and dairy products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Plastic household containers for milk and dairy products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements and informational communications in all types of media, namely, printed materials for newspapers, magazines, brochures, public display, signage, television and radio broadcasts, electronic media accessible through a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Joel W. Aldred Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Joel W. Aldred Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Joel W. Aldred Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE SOFTEST SOFT DRINK OF ALL...MILK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |