Drawing for STAR JONES

USPTO serial 76286835

STAR JONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAR JONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jean Voutsinas

EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Bed sheets, bed spread, bed blankets, blanket throws, comforters, pillow cases, pillow covers, pillow shams, dust ruffles, curtains; window treatments, namely poufs, puffs and swags and fabric valances; dish cloths, pot holders; table linen, namely placemats, table cloths not of paper, and coastersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 25, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 25, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance