USPTO serial 76286917
RETROGRADE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RETROGRADE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software used to receive, display, and transmit recorded video, audio, and digital data signals; electronic signal encoders and decoders used to encode and decode digital audio and video signals; computer software and firmware for use in electronic devices for encoding and decoding audio and visual data; computer hardware; integrated circuits; integrated circuit chips; semiconductor processors; semiconductor processor chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |