USPTO serial 76286919
SIMPLICITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMPLICITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Charlotte, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joyce W. Jenzano
JOYCE W JENZANO MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC2200 W MAIN STSTE 800DURHAM, NC 27705-4658Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for exchanging communications and information and conducting government-related transactions for use in management and coordination of community access technology and information systems for use by municipal government entities and other public entities; computer software for exchanging communications and information and conducting government-related transactions designed to facilitate access by private citizens, businesses, emergency and non-emergency municipal employees and the agencies they serve, to governmental agencies, data sources, and services 24 hours a day through telephony or through electronic mail; computer software for the purpose of end to end tracking of workflow from initiation of users' requests to task completion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |