Drawing for PECAS VW PRECOS

USPTO serial 76286965

PECAS VW PRECOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PECAS VW PRECOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Menker

JAMES R MENKER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPPO BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007VEHICLE MOTOR PARTS, NAMELY, BUOY STYLO VALVES; VEHICLE RADIATOR CONNECTING HOSESACTIVE—
009THERMAL SWITCHES FOR RADIATORS; SPEEDOMETER CABLES FOR AUTOMOBILES; VEHICLE ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNITS; RADIOS CASSETTE PLAYERS, AND CD PLAYERS FOR VEHICLES; INTERNAL ANTENNAS; AUDIO SPEAKERS; LOUDSPEAKERS; LOUDSPEAKER CABINETS; RACKS FOR LOUDSPEAKERS; AND BATTERIES FOR VEHICLESACTIVE—
011VEHICLE HEADLIGHTS; TAILLIGHTS FOR VEHICLES; LIGHT REFLECTORS FOR VEHICLES; VEHICLE TURN-SIGNAL LIGHTS; RUNNING LIGHTS FOR LAND VEHICLES; INTERIOR LIGHTING FOR VEHICLES; AND AUTOMOBILE LIGHTS AND LENSES AND MOUNTING AND HOUSINGS THEREFORACTIVE—
017RUBBER FOR VEHICLES; RUBBER FOR THE SUPERIOR MOTOR FRAME; REAR RUBBER RING OF THE CRANKSHAFT DRILLING; AND NON-METAL COUPLINGS FOR USE WITH WATER PUMP RADIATOR HOSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 9, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 8, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 2, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance