USPTO serial 76286975
NICE ICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3197823Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NICE ICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Roseburg, OR
Roseburg, OR
Roseburg, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Heisler
BRADLEY P HEISLER HEISLER & ASSOCIATES3017 DOUGLAS BLVD STE 300ROSEVILLE, CA 95661UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Diamonds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |