USPTO serial 76287108
SNACK INVASION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'LEAR, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNACK INVASION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly Mahon Tullier
KELLY MAHON TULLIER FRITO LAYMAIL DROP 3 A 4207701 LEGACY DRPLANO, TX 75024-4099Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | POTATO-BASED SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, POTATO CHIPS AND POTATO CRISPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | CORN-BASED SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, TORTILLA CHIPS, CORN CHIPS AND CHEESE FLAVORED PUFFED CORN SNACKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE COMPUTER GAMES AND CONTESTS VIA A WEB SITE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Recot, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Recot, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SNACK INVASION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |