USPTO serial 76287152
LAROLUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3147064Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LAROLUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, DE
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, DE
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PLASTIC MOLDING COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC EXTRUSION OPERATIONS IN THE FORM OF POWDERS, PASTES, LIQUIDS, GRANULES, DISPERSIONS; UNPROCESSED ARTIFICIAL RESINS; CHEMICALS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ULTRAVIOLET AND RADIATION CURABLE COATINGS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; AND ADHESIVES FOR USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | SERVICES OF A CHEMIST; SERVICES OF A CHEMICAL ENGINEER; LABORATORY RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF CHEMISTRY; AND TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BASF Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by BASF Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by BASF Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LAROLUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2006 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |