USPTO serial 76287189
CHEAP SLUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHEAP SLUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwynne B. Barrett
GWYNNE B BARRETT KATICH, WERSE & PETILLO823 RIVER RDFAIR HAVEN, NJ 07704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | water based personal sexual lubricant | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |