USPTO serial 76287274
M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GREAT HARVEST FRANCHISING, INC.
DILLON, MT
MMBC ACQUISITION COMPANY, INC.
DILLON, MT
Rochester, NY
Rochester, NY
Rochester, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Casimir W. Cook II
Casimir W. Cook II Anvil Law PLC2723 South State StreetSuite 150Ann Arbor, MI 48104Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT HARVEST FRANCHISING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MMBC ACQUISITION COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Montana Mills Bread Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Montana Mills Bread Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Montana Mills Bread Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named M
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |