USPTO serial 76287420
PAUL FRANK PAUL FRANK INDUSTRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAUL FRANK PAUL FRANK INDUSTRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine L. Lofgren, Esq.
ROD S BERMAN ESQ JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS, 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment, namely a continuing cartoon series featuring a cast of characters distributed over television, Internet, satellite, and video media; Motion picture film production and webisodes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Frank Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Frank Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PAUL FRANK PAUL FRANK INDUSTRIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |