USPTO serial 76287469
Q-VIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Q-VIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109-1800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for use by information technology specialists in performing help desk functions and for measuring, logging, and cataloging performance of an organization's internal support operations and help desk functions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 5, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |