USPTO serial 76287531
FABER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2006
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FABER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES SWITZERLAND GMBH
LUZERN, CH
Other trademarks owned by HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES SWITZERLAND GMBH
2970 Hørsholm, DK
DK-5856 Ryslinge, DK
DK-5856 Ryslinge, DK
DK-5856 Ryslinge, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Holman
MARSHA G. GENTNER JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL FITTINGS AND ACCESSORIES FOR VENETIAN BLINDS, VERTICAL BLINDS, ROLLER BLINDS, BLACKOUT BLINDS, NAMELY, SPRINGS, BARS AND RAILS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 22, 2001 |
| 020 | WINDOW BLINDS, NAMELY VENETIAN BLINDS, VERTICAL BLINDS, BLACKOUT BLINDS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 22, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES SWITZERLAND GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by VKR HOLDING A/S
- Other trademarks owned by FABER A/S
- Other trademarks owned by FABER A/S
- Other trademarks owned by FABER A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named FABER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 22, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |