USPTO serial 76287568
EMERGING DESIGNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 25, 2003
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMERGING DESIGNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Manny D. Pokotilow
MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, ET AL12TH FL - 7 PENN CTR1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING RECOGNITION AND INCENTIVES BY WAY OF AWARDS TO DEMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN THE FIELD OF FASHION DESIGN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 18, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |