USPTO serial 76287634
CITP CERTIFIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITP CERTIFIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael K. Cantwell
GRACE YOO WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019-6099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Strategic planning, implementation and management of computer and telecommunications information systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
- Other trademarks owned by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
- Other trademarks in Class B
- Similar marks named CITP CERTIFIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |