Drawing for TRAILERBRAIN

USPTO serial 76287641

TRAILERBRAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAILERBRAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James B. Muskal

JAMES B MUSKAL LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER OPERATED ELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY, SENSORS, DETECTORS, INDICATORS, MONITORS, DIAGNOSTIC CONTROLS AND DATA COLLECTORS FOR MOBILE, TRANSPORTABLE AND RELOCATABLE UNITS ALL WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, GLOBAL NETWORK, OR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM CAPABILITY FOR USE IN TRUCKS, TRAILERS, SEMI-TRAILERS, CONTAINERS, RAIL CARS, AIR, LAND AND WATER VEHICLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 5, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance