USPTO serial 76287736
CLARITY INCENTIVE SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2003
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLARITY INCENTIVE SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Clarity Incentive Systems, Inc.
New York, NY
Clarity Incentive Systems, Inc.
New York, NY
Clarity Incentive Systems, Inc.
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy Gardner
NANCY GARDNER NEEDLE & ROSENBERG PC999 PEACHTREE ST STE 1000ATLANTA, GA 30309-3915UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services, namely, providing consumer inducements and incentives, namely, credits, payments, and transfer in the form of money or economic value, to encourage consumers to visit websites, watch advertisements, complete surveys and forms, and patronize websites; providing online stored value accounts in open environments; providing electronic multimerchant gift tender; providing electronic multimerchant currency in the form of money or economic value; distributing electronic multimerchant currency that is used for the purchase of goods or services from third parties by direct purchase or through gift certificates and accompanying greeting cards, debit cards, or electronic funds transfer; providing debit cards in conjunction with promotional, incentive and loyalty schemes for the benefit of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 22, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clarity Incentive Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clarity Incentive Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clarity Incentive Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CLARITY INCENTIVE SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |