USPTO serial 76287744
SMOOTHIEPACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3300236Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMOOTHIEPACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Juice Company (Europe) Limited
London N1 0QH, GB
Other trademarks owned by The Juice Company (Europe) Limited
The Juice Company (Europe) Limited
London N1 0QH, GB
Other trademarks owned by The Juice Company (Europe) Limited
THE CLEVER LITTLE DRINKS CO LIMITED (REG. NO. 6558981) FORMERLY CALLED FOLLYHALL LIMITED
WESTHOUGHTON, LANCS, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Scott Gerien
J. Scott Gerien DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY1455 FIRST STREET, STE 301NAPA, CA 94559-2822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Blended pure fruit beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Juice Company (Europe) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by The Juice Company (Europe) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by THE CLEVER LITTLE DRINKS CO LIMITED (REG. NO. 6558981) FORMERLY CALLED FOLLYHALL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SMOOTHIEPACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |