USPTO serial 76287820
WARSTEINER DUNKEL DIE KONIGIN UNTER DEN BIEREN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2003
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WARSTEINER DUNKEL DIE KONIGIN UNTER DEN BIEREN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WARSTEINER BRAUEREI HAUS CRAMER KG
Warstein, DE
Other trademarks owned by WARSTEINER BRAUEREI HAUS CRAMER KG
WARSTEINER BRAUEREI HAUS CRAMER KG
Warstein, DE
Other trademarks owned by WARSTEINER BRAUEREI HAUS CRAMER KG
WARSTEINER BRAUEREI HAUS CRAMER KG
Warstein, DE
Other trademarks owned by WARSTEINER BRAUEREI HAUS CRAMER KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier
GEORGE A PELLETIER CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREET22ND FLOORHARTFORD, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer; non-alcoholic drinks, namely non-alcoholic beer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WARSTEINER BRAUEREI HAUS CRAMER KG
- Other trademarks owned by WARSTEINER BRAUEREI HAUS CRAMER KG
- Other trademarks owned by WARSTEINER BRAUEREI HAUS CRAMER KG
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named WARSTEINER DUNKEL DIE KONIGIN UNTER DEN BIEREN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2008 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |