Drawing for UPS MAIL TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 76288005

UPS MAIL TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UPS MAIL TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Schaetzel

Stephen M. Schaetzel KING & SPALDING LLP1180 Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for delivery, storage and viewing of electronic documents; computer software for web-based archivingACTIVE—
035Arranging expedited pick-up and reproduction of documents, packages and personal property by air, rail, boat and motor vehicles; sorting of documents, packages and personal property; preparing online status regarding the tracking of mail and packagesACTIVE—
036Electronic bill presentment and payment and viewing of electronic copies of billsACTIVE—
038Online delivery of documents via a global computer networkACTIVE—
039Expedited document, package and personal property delivery by air, rail, boat and motor vehicles; storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data; and providing an online database relating to delivery storage and viewing of electronic documentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 16, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 31, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance