Drawing for SUCCESS THROUGH KNOWLEDGE

USPTO serial 76288213

SUCCESS THROUGH KNOWLEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2847164Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 1, 2004
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SUCCESS THROUGH KNOWLEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca B. Lederhouse

Rebecca B. Lederhouse BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP300 E. Randolph StreetSuite 5000CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, conducting seminars, conferences, workshops and on site training in the field of organizational efficiencies and to identify and eliminate wasteful activitiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 27, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 16, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 20, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 17, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance