Drawing for TANBRAND

USPTO serial 76288293

TANBRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TANBRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce W. Schwab

BRUCE W SCHWAB TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006WIRE ROPE FITTINGS, NAMELY; WIRE ROPE CLIPS, STEEL EYE HOIST HOOKS, SNAP HOOKS, BOAT HOOKS, PEAR LINKS, SWIVELS, EYE BOLTS, LEVER TYPE AND RATCHET TYPE LOAD BINDERS, WINCHES, TURNBUCKLES AND SHACKLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 31, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 27, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance