USPTO serial 76288627
SONTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SONTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott H. Culley
Scott H. Culley Packard Dierking LLC2595 Canyon Blvd Suite 200Boulder, CO 80302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Hand held stainless steel and titanium surgical instruments, namely, operating scissors, general surgery scissors, bandage scissors, hemostats, towel clamps, tube occluding clamps, scalpel handles, sponge forceps, sterilizing trays, stainless steel hollow ware, namely, sponge bowls, sterilizing pans and lids for pans, mayo instrument tray, emesis basin, iodine cup, medicine cup, and forceps, jar, forceps holders, sterilizing instruments, namely, [ sterilizing and three-prong sterilizing forceps, ] needle holders, suture clip appliers, ligature carriers, dressing and tissue forceps, intestinal clamps, gall bladder probes, gall bladder scoops, [ gall duct clamps, ] vein strippers, suction tubes, trocars, malletts, [ surgical loupes, ] grooved directors, probes, dermal punches, comedone extractors, finger retractors, flexible shaft retractors, hand retractors, self retaining retractors, rake retractors, hooks, skin retractors, abdominal retractors, [ vaginal speculums, ] plaster cast instruments, bone holding clamps, bone reduction clamps, bone retractors, orthopedic rongeurs, bone curettes, bone cutters, orthopedic chisels, orthopedic ostetomes, orthopedic gouges, periosteal elevators, orthopedic raspatories, orthopedic saws, cartilage and tendon clamps, orthopedic drills, pin cutters, vice grips, micro surgical scissors, hemostats, forceps, needle holders, bayonet forceps, micro surgical vessel hooks, laminectomy rongeurs, disc rongeurs, bipolar forceps, monopolar forceps, dura hooks, knives end elevators, nerve and vein retractors, brain suction tubes, spoons and spatulas, pituitary curettes, cranial drills, neuro clips and appliers, rib retractors, rib shears, thoracic clamps and forceps, auricle clamps, vena cava clamps, coronary artery scissors, aortic punch, eye needle holders, scissors forceps, hooks, spatulas, probe scissors, [ tonometers, ] ear specula, allifator ear forceps, tuning forks, ear curettes, [ knife guide and instrument guide probes, ] cilia forceps, [ mastoid instruments, namely, Alexander mastoid chisels, Alexander mastoid gouges, Andrew mastoid chisels, Andrew mastoid gouges, and kerrison mastoid rongeur, ] adenoid curettes, [ adenetomes, ] mouth gags, uvula retractor, adenoid punches, tonsil seizing forceps, tonsil snares, endoscopic forceps, rectal speculums, rectal biopsy instruments, prostatic retractors, kidney stone forceps, [ urethreal sounds and dilators, vaginal sounds and dilators, uterine curettes, uterine biopsy, ] uterine tenaculums, polyp forceps, [ hysterectomy forceps, placenta forceps, ] circumcision clamps [, obstetrical forceps, ] extraction pliers | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 3, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 15, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |