USPTO serial 76289014
WATER IN THE GARDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATER IN THE GARDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sanford E. Warren
SANFORD E WARREN GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | FLOWER BED WATER FOUNTAINS, FLOWER POT WATER FOUNTAINS, CISTERNS AND DECK POOLS, NAMELY, WHIRLPOOLS; DECK POOLS, NAMELY, DECORATIVE WATER FOUNTAINS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |