Drawing for SNAPCOM

USPTO serial 76289030

SNAPCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNAPCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Gitchel

JEFFREY M GITCHEL KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLPHENRY W OLIVER BLDG535 SMITHFIELD STPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2312

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF E-COMMERCE; BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DATABASE MANAGEMENTACTIVE—
038PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING HIGH SPEED ACCESS TO AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, TEXT, MESSAGES, AND GRAPHICS BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICESACTIVE—
039STORAGE OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA, NAMELY, IMAGES, TEXT AND AUDIO DATAACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SECURITY SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING FIREWALL, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK, AND VIRUS PROTECTION SERVICES; CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF VOICE NETWORK DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY CREATING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING, AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP), NAMELY, HOSTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS; COMPUTER NETWORK DESIGN FOR OTHERS; CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK DESIGN AND INSTALLATION, COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK MANAGEMENT, DIGITAL DATA MANAGEMENT, COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SECURITY, DIGITAL DATA SECURITY, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS, AND FIREWALL DESIGN, MANAGEMENT, AND INTEGRATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance