USPTO serial 76289164
B BRADFORD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B BRADFORD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Roos
RICHARD J ROOS EDWARDS & ANGELL LLPPO BOX 55874BOSTON, MA 02205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Products for body and beauty care, namely, skin soap, toilet soap, bath soap, deodorant soap, facial cleansing creams, cleansing mousses, cleansing powders, hand cream, cold cream, night cream, skin cleansing cream, moisturizing lotions, body lotions, hand lotions, face lotions, bubble bath, shower gels, skin cleansing gels, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, sun blocking preparations, suntan preparations, face cleansing masks in the form of gels, creams and lotions, shaving cream, shaving foam, shaving lotions, personal deodorants, and antiperspirants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Original Bradford Soap Works, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Original Bradford Soap Works, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named B BRADFORD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |