USPTO serial 76289224
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT DUBNO
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVEP O BOX 900BRONX, NY 10471-0900| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | red wine, white wine, sparkling wines | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |