USPTO serial 76289412
EXEKIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXEKIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE
MICHAEL FORZANO PALL CORPORATION2200 NORTHERN BLVDEAST HILLS, NY 11548UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | POROUS CERAMIC MATERIAL, NAMELY, SINTERED OR NON-SINTERED METAL OXIDES AND NON-OXIDES FOR USE IN THE FILTRATION INDUSTRY AND THE CHROMATOGRAPHY INDUSTRY, NAMELY, TANGENTIAL FILTRATION, NAMELY MICROFILTRATION,ULTRAFILTRATION, NANOFILTRATION AND REVERSE OSMOSIS, FOR ANY LIQUID;POROUS CERAMIC MATERIAL, NAMELY SINTERED OR NON-SINTERED METAL OXIDES OR NON-OXIDES FOR USE IN THE FILTRATION INDUSTRY AND THE CHROMATOGRAPHY INDUSTRY, NAMELY FOR THE CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION OF ANY LIQUID | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2001 |
| 011 | COMPOSITE FILTERS MADE OF POROUS CERAMIC MATERIAL FOR USE IN THE FILTRATION INDUSTRY AND THE CHROMATOGRAPHY INDUSTRY, NAMELY,TANGENTIAL FILTRATION, NAMELY, MICROFILTRATION, ULTRAFILTRATION,NANOFILTRATION AND REVERSE OSMOSIS, FOR ANY LIQUID, AS PARTS OF HOUSEHOLD OR INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; EQUIPMENT FOR THE FILTRATION AND SEPARATION OF ANY LIQUID, NAMELY, LIQUID FILTRATION AND SEPARATION MODULES, FOR USE IN THE FILTRATION INDUSTRY AND THE CHROMATOGRAPHY INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |