USPTO serial 76289448
NIMOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIMOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RIEMSER ARZNEIMIHEL AG (RIEMSER ARZNEIMITTEL)
GREIFSWALD IND RIEMS, DE
Other trademarks owned by RIEMSER ARZNEIMIHEL AG (RIEMSER ARZNEIMITTEL)
Berlin, DE
Berlin, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
HORST M KASPER13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059-5832UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RIEMSER ARZNEIMIHEL AG (RIEMSER ARZNEIMITTEL)
- Other trademarks owned by Rosch AG Medizentechnik
- Other trademarks owned by Rosch AG Medizentechnik
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named NIMOS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |