USPTO serial 76289598
Serial No. 76289598
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76289598?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Jose, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK E GUEVARA
PATRICK E GUEVARA HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL60 S MARKET ST STE 1400SAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | sports apparel and clothing, namely, shirts, hockey jerseys, polo shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, and hats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |