USPTO serial 76289604
PENIEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PENIEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Buenos Aires, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Slotnick
MICHAEL C SLOTNICK RASCO,REININGER & PEREZ, PA283 CATALONIA AVE FL 2CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-6700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Religious books, religious circular letters, religious booklets, religious magazines, religious newsletters, sheet music, printed music books, greeting cards | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1986 |
| 041 | Publication of religious books, religious circular letters, religious booklets, religious magazines, religious newsletters, sheet music, printed music books, greeting cards, record production, audio recording and production | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |