USPTO serial 76289619
SOUTHERN BAT COMPANY DIAMOND HARD CUSTOM BATS COLUMBUS, MISSISSIPPI USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2718610Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2003
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOUTHERN BAT COMPANY DIAMOND HARD CUSTOM BATS COLUMBUS, MISSISSIPPI USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | baseball bats | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Haynes, Charles Duncan Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Haynes, Charles Duncan Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Haynes, Charles Duncan Jr.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SOUTHERN BAT COMPANY DIAMOND HARD CUSTOM BATS COLUMBUS, MISSISSIPPI USA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2009 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |