Drawing for CORPORATE HOPE

USPTO serial 76289653

CORPORATE HOPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORPORATE HOPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041CONDUCTING WORKSHOPS, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, RETREATS AND PROFESSIONAL COACHING IN THE FIELD OF SELF-IMPROVEMENT TO ENHANCE EXECUTIVE WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 31, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 7, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 7, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 31, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance