USPTO serial 76289894
AGRACAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGRACAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Farmington, AR
Farmington, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Pellegrin
JOHN D PELLEGRIN9306 OLD KEENE ML RD BURKE VA 22015-4280BURKE, VA 22015-4280Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines, namely, front-end loaders and agricultural machine implements or tractor towed implements, namely, incorporators, seed drills, cultivators, harvesters, disk harrows, seeders, combines, threshers, tillers, windrowers, plows, disc harrows, mowers, reapers, hay rakes, hay balers, broadcast seeders, fertilizer distributors, corn huskers, rollers | ABANDONED | Oct 6, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |