USPTO serial 76289902
LIVE CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIVE CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kirchheim 85551, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY FOR USE IN AUTHORING AND RUNNING AUDIO AND VIDEO BROADCASTS FOR THE INTERNET INCLUDING SYNCHRONIZED RICH MEDIA ELEMENTS | ACTIVE | Aug 4, 2000 |
| 041 | PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE USAGE FOR AUTHORING AND RUNNING AUDIO AND VIDEO BROADCASTS FOR THE INTERNET AND FOR PROVIDING PROFESSIONAL RICH MEDIA LIVE STREAMING FOR EVENTS | ACTIVE | Aug 4, 2000 |
| 042 | DESIGNING THE SOFTWARE OF OTHERS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING | ACTIVE | Aug 4, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |