USPTO serial 76290022
METALJACKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2793652Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 2003
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with METALJACKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
Cary, NC
CARY, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd W. Galinski
Todd W. Galinski LORD CORPORATION111 Lord DriveCARY, NC 27511UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations for use in the manufacture of surface coatings; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of metal surface adhesives and primers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2001 |
| 002 | Anti-corrosive and corrosion resistant coatings in the nature of paint; rust preventatives in the nature of a coating; primers for preparing surfaces to be painted | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2001 |
| 003 | CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS FOR USE IN PREPARING SURFACES FOR RUST PROTECTIVE PREPARATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2001 |
| 037 | Rustproofing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2001 |
| 040 | Metal treatment services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LORD TECHMARK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LORD TECHMARK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LORD TECHMARK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Lord Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by LORD CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named METALJACKET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |