USPTO serial 76290253
ENVIROSAFE WOOD TREATMENT PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENVIROSAFE WOOD TREATMENT PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell D. Orkin
RUSSELL D ORKIN WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON,P436 7TH AVE STE 700PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Wood treating chemicals, namely, wood preservatives for the manufacture of pressure-treated lumber | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Wood treatment services, namely the industrial treatment of lumber to protect against fungus, termites, insects, rot, mold and mildew, and to increase the overall stability of wood | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |