Drawing for GENCIS

USPTO serial 76290276

GENCIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENCIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic machines and instruments, namely, computers, computer hardware, computer software used in business process management; computer peripherals, namely, computer keyboards, computer monitors, computer memories, computer printers, and computer screen filters; communication apparatus/instruments, namely, interactive computer terminals, wireless communications units in the nature of cellular telephones, telecommunication cables; computer cables; computer telephony software for enabling telephone activities to be performed through a computer; electric power cables; computer operating systems; computer software development toolsACTIVE—
035Conducting business and market research surveys; referrals in the field of computer, marketing and human resource management; operation of computers for others; business acquisition and merger consultation; business management of technical collaboration for others; business management and consultation; import/export agency services for others in the field of computer hardware and software, advertising agencies, namely, promoting computer services through the distribution of printed promotional materials and by rendering sales promotion; sales consulting services in the field of the use of computer hardware and software systems for othersACTIVE—
041Educational and instructional services, namely, conducting symposia, classes, seminars, workshops and conferences in the fields of computers, computer networks and softwareACTIVE—
042Computer programming for others; information system design for others; consultation and technical management of information systems for others; providing technical information for others relating to computer or electronic components; testing and research in the field of telecommunication systems by computer; news agencies, namely, gathering and dissemination of news; technical consultation in the computer field; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation, and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; development of new technology for others in the computer fieldACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 26, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance