USPTO serial 76290300
EXCEPTIONAL PROPANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2004
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXCEPTIONAL PROPANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lake Stevens, WA
Lake Stevens, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ward Brown
WARD BROWN CHRISTENSEN O'CONOR JOHNSON & KINDESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |