USPTO serial 76290365
NANOSONIC THIN FILMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NANOSONIC THIN FILMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Christiansburg, VA
Christiansburg, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter E. Rosden
PETER E ROSDEN WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, PLC250 W MAIN STSTE 300CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902-5000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives, namely, inorganic oxide nanoclusters for use in the manufacture of nanostructured coatings | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Industrial robotic equipment for computer controlled fabrication of multiplayer materials synthesized at each layer on a molecular basis for use in applying nanostructured coatings to other materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Applying nanostructured coatings to plastics, metals, ceramics, single crystal materials and composites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NanoSonic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NanoSonic, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named NANOSONIC THIN FILMS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |