USPTO serial 76290375
MOBILEARIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOBILEARIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather A. Dunn
HEATHER A DUNN ESQ GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP8TH FL153 TOWNSEND STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107-1907Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer communications software for providing voice-enabled access to the Internet via mobile devices, namely, personal digital assistants, personal computers, wireless telephones, and wireless communication devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |