USPTO serial 76290446
EXACOMM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXACOMM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diana Michelle Sobo
DIANA MICHELLE SOBO BROWDY AND NEIMARK624 9TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTATION RELATED TO THE PURCHASE AND SELLING OF SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURES, FOR USE IN MARKET RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, AND FOR USE IN RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS OF NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES; COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA ABOUT HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE OF THIRD PARTIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ADVICE REGARDING PROPER SOFTWARE TO PURCHASE | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | DOCUMENT DATA TRANSFER AND PHYSICAL CONVERSION SERVICES FROM ONE MEDIA TO ANOTHER | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS OF NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE; COMPUTER CONSULTATION, NAMELY CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER AUTOMATION AND THE USE OF SOFTWARE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURES; IMPLEMENTATION OF SOFTWARE FOR THIRD PARTIES AND CONSULTATION IN THIS RESPECT; IMPLEMENTATION OF SOFTWARE FOR CONNECTING DATABASES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR THIRD PARTIES; DESIGNING, BUILDING, CONNECTING, ADAPTING, AND UP-DATING INSTALLATION AND TESTING SOFTWARE; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR USE IN RESPECT OF THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |