USPTO serial 76290466
JOVY CHAMOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINYK, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOVY CHAMOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LIC. CONNY GUTIERREZ WONG
RENEE ROBLES GWT10 MADISON LNHILTON HEAD ISLAND, SC 29926UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CANDY, NAMELY, LIQUID TAMARIND AND CHILI FLAVORED CANDY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |