USPTO serial 76290509
ATKINS NUTRITIONAL APPROACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATKINS NUTRITIONAL APPROACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A. DEMARO
JOHN A DEMARO RUSKIN, MOSCOU & FALTISCHEK PC190 EAB PLZ 15TH FLUNIONDALE, NY 11556UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food supplements, vitamins, mineral supplements, nutritional supplements, nutritional candy bars, dietary supplements and dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement, all of which do not contain ginseng | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2003 |
| 029 | Low carbohydrate dairy based and soy based shake mixes, vegetable based and soy based ready to eat food bars, snack food dips, soups, soup mixes, whipped topping, potato based snack foods, soy based snack foods, and potato chips, all of which do not contain ginseng | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2001 |
| 030 | Grain based, chocolate based, oat based and granola based ready to eat food bars, cereal based snack foods, rice based snack foods, corn based snack foods, bakery goods, pastries, wheat based crackers, toasted corn snacks, corn chips, grain based chips, biscuits, candy, puffed corn snacks, puffed rice snacks, bagels, baking powder, barbecue sauce, bran, bread, bread sticks, breakfast cereals, cake mixes, cakes, bake mix, processed cereals, flour, cheesecake, flour-based chips, grain based chips, chocolate chips, chocolate powder, chocolate syrup, chocolate topping, cones for ice cream, cookies, crackers, dough, flavoring syrup, ice cream, icing, pancake syrup, marshmallows, pancake mixes, pizza dough, pizza sauce, spaghetti sauce, tomato sauce, pretzels, puddings, salad dressings, taco chips, taco shells, tacos, and waffles, all of which do not contain ginseng | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atkins Nutritionals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Atkins Nutritionals, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ATKINS NUTRITIONAL APPROACH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |