Drawing for FREDDY THE PIG

USPTO serial 76290822

FREDDY THE PIG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREDDY THE PIG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip H. Miller

PHILIP H MILLER IRELL & MANELLAAVE OF THE STARS1800 AVE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4276

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Stuffed toy animals; toy banks; bath toys; toy building and construction blocks; board games; toy music boxes; toy boxes; equipment bags especially designed for carrying baseball, basketball, bowling, football, and/or soccer equipment; bubble making wand and solution set; card games; balloons; Christmas tree ornaments; dolls; doll cases; doll clothing; action skill games; rubber action balls; kites; manipulative games and puzzles; marbles; mechanical action toys; electric action toys; hand held unit for playing electronic games; mobiles for children; toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; musical toys; toy noisemakers; jigsaw puzzles; toy figures; plush toys; squeezable squeaking toys; water squirting toys; wind-up toys; and yo-yosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 7, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance