USPTO serial 76291031
UNCLE LOUIE'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2981304Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2005
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UNCLE LOUIE'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
Laurel V. Dineff WWIPPS, Inc.160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KKT Group Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KKT Group Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KKT Group Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UNCLE LOUIE'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |