USPTO serial 76291151
OMNITAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMNITAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen G. Mellon
KATHLEEN G MELLON YOUNG & BASILE, PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEDICATED PLASTERS, MATERIALS FOR SURGICAL AND MEDICAL DRESSINGS, BANDAGES AND BANDS FOR MEDIAL USE, NAMELY, GAUZE, MEDICATED GAUZE, AND ADHESIVE TAPE BANDAGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |