Drawing for TECHNOLOGY THAT GROWS

USPTO serial 76291212

TECHNOLOGY THAT GROWS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHNOLOGY THAT GROWS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edmund J. Sease

EDMUND J SEASE ZARLEY MCKEE THOMTE VOORHEES801 GRAND AVE STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives for use in the manufacture of agricultural fertilizerABANDONEDJun 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2002ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance