USPTO serial 76291304
BEACH BALMSHELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEACH BALMSHELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KAO KABUSHIKI KAISAH, ALSO TRADING AS KAO CORPORATION
CHUO-KU, TOKYO 103-2810, JP
Other trademarks owned by KAO KABUSHIKI KAISAH, ALSO TRADING AS KAO CORPORATION
John Frieda Professional Hair Care, Inc.
Wilton, CT
Other trademarks owned by John Frieda Professional Hair Care, Inc.
John Frieda Professional Hair Care, Inc.
Wilton, CT
Other trademarks owned by John Frieda Professional Hair Care, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIE V DRISCOLL
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair styling products, namely, hair styling cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KAO KABUSHIKI KAISAH, ALSO TRADING AS KAO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by John Frieda Professional Hair Care, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by John Frieda Professional Hair Care, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BEACH BALMSHELL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |