Drawing for SMOVER

USPTO serial 76291387

SMOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard C. Gilmore

Richard C. Gilmore MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELSEN & WRIGH111 S. Main StreetSuite 600Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012BICYCLES, PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR BICYCLES, NAMELY, HUBS, INTERNAL GEAR HUBS, HUB QUICK RELEASE LEVERS, GEAR RELEASE LEVERS, GEAR SHIFT LEVERS, FRONT DERAILLEURS, REAR DERAILLEURS, CHAIN GUIDES, FREEWHEELS, SPROCKETS, PULLEYS, CHAINS, CHAIN DEFLECTORS, SHIFT CABLES, CRANKS, CRANK SETS, CHAIN WHEELS, PEDALS, TOE CLIPS, BRAKE LEVERS, FRONT BRAKES, REAR BRAKES, BRAKE CABLES, BRAKE SHOES, RIMS, WHEELS, SPOKES, SPOKE CLIPS, BOTTOM BRACKETS, SEAT PILLARS, SEAT PILLAR QUICK RELEASE, HEAD PARTS FOR FRAME-FORK ASSEMBLY, FRAMES, SUSPENSIONS, HANDLEBARS, HANDLES STEMS, GRIPS FOR HANDLEBARS, SADDLES, MUDGUARDS, KICK STANDS, CARRIERS, BELLS, HORNS AND REARVIEW MIRRORS FOR BICYCLES, DERAILLEURS CONTROLLED BY COMPUTERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 19, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance